As some of you might already know, I started going back to school this summer. I'm almost finished with my two summer classes, and can say that I've been very busy for the past 3 months. For one of my classes, I was assigned a 1500 word paper on any facet of technology I deemed suitable to research. I finally decided to take up the subject of affordable personal air transportation. So without further delay, I submit for your approval...my latest work:
Still Waiting: the Broken
Childhood Promise of a Hover Board.
For
the majority of my childhood, I was operating under the false pretense that in
the near future, we would all have hover boards, jet packs, and flying cars.
From the first time I saw the Jetsons
in their bubble domed grocery getter, I dreamed of the day where technology
would catch up to our imaginations. As life on planet earth moves on through
the final decades of the 1900's, the lie was further propagated by other movies
and television shows like Star Wars, Star Trek, the Rocketeer, and most disappointingly Back to the Future Part II. The fact that the kids in the future
had toy hover boards that were operated by some sort of electromagnetism
boggled my mind. What made the promise even more realistic was the fact that it
was branded with a real toy manufacturer from my own world. I thought to
myself, "Surely, a responsible company like Mattel is currently working on
getting this product to its valued consumers - namely, me. They must have spent
years in the research and development of such a marvel of science and
technology; and now, they are finally ready to present it to the masses."
Why else would they place it in this movie? Surely it wasn't just a clever logo
placement by advertising executives.
Sadly,
My hover board never showed up under the Christmas tree that year, or the year
after that...or even the year after that. My young mind couldn't comprehend why
there weren't teams of engineers and scientists working around the clock on
this issue for the betterment of mankind. Frankly, I'm still baffled by the
gross negligence, both on the part of the technology industries and Mattel
Corp. This must be a conspiracy on the level of the JFK assassination or
something out of a Dan Brown novel. Surely, if the human race can create a
variety of other forms of aircraft and spacecraft, personal forms of the
technology shouldn't be too far away. Yet, I have waited nearly 35 years of my life
to have my own personal, affordable form of flying transportation. We can have
portable, hand-held computers that fit in our pockets and keep us connected on
a global scale, yet we can't seem to crack the code on personal air propulsion.
Why is that the case? Through this discussion, I intend to explore that
question, look at some emerging technologies that are bringing us closer to
achieving success, and to see what types of vessels are out there now in the
experimental phase that we might see hit the market within our lifetimes.
|
Rossy
isn't the only one who has been busy. The New Zealand based Martin Aviation
Company has managed to engineer a jetpack that just might be the new standard
for future designs (martinjetpack.com). Though not as visually appealing
Rossy's design, the Martin jetpack has distinct advantages over the Jetman's
wing. Most notable is the fact that the Martin jetpack is capable of a vertical
takeoff and vertical landing. It also has a considerably longer operating time
of about 30 minutes and runs on premium gasoline. Billed as "the first
practical
jetpack," it has many potential applications including
military, search and rescue, police and emergency response to name a few
(martinjetpack.com). There has also been a substantial buzz with aviation
enthusiasts in regard to recreational usage. There are a few drawbacks,
however, to the Martin jetpack. It's quite bulky, weighing in at just over 250
lbs. This makes it difficult to really consider it a jetpack per se; since
no normal person would be able to walk around with it
strapped to their backs. The limited operating range is also an obstacle before
it can be considered 'practical' transportation - not to mention the estimated
$100,000 price tag. I know that's not in my budget, but it's good to know Bill
Gates and Mark Zuckerberg will be able to afford theirs.
|
In
all seriousness, it's not just about my childhood dream of flying that
compelled me to write this paper. Transportation and our dependence of fossil
fuels are a serious matter. It isn't a sustainable energy source for our
future. I truly believe that once we realize the current paradigm is flawed and
sure to fail, we will make the necessary changes in the way we get around the
world. Who wouldn't want to naturally have that method of transport be as
liberating as possible? Who wouldn't want to fly through the clouds or float
effortlessly on a cushion of air? Surely I'm not the only one. Judging from the
evidence I gathered in my research, I'm clearly not alone. People are making
advances. Maybe when I'm old and grey, I can be the first Octogenarian to break
his hip on a hover board. Then I'll be able to die happy.
Word Count: 1584
Works
Cited
Basulto,
Dominic. "Levitation could be the
next big science fiction technology to hit it big" The Washington Post.
18 July 2013. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/wp/2013/07/18/levitation-could-be-the-next-big-science-fiction-technology-to-hit-it-big/?hpid=z10>.
"Jet
Pack." Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. 16 July 2013. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_pack>.
"Martin
Jetpack." MartinJetpack.com. 15 April 2013. <http://martinjetpack.com/>.
"PAL-V
One Writing History." PAL-V.com. 27 July 2013. <http://pal-v.com/>.
"Quantum
Levitation." QuantumLevitation.com. 28 July 2013. <http://www.quantumlevitation.com/>.
Rossy,
Yves. "Jetman: Yves Rossy." Jetman.com. 8 May 2013. <http://www.jetman.com/?page_id=24>.
"Terrafugia:
A New Dimension of Freedom." Terrafugia.com. 26 July 2013. <http://www.terrafugia.com/>.